Early childhood education at home and abroad

Summary of Main Findings on Early Childhood Education in the U.S.

The date from the two most recent and reputable comparison studies by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)(2020) and the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)(2016) and the UNICEF website do not assign a specific numerical ranking to the U.S. relative to other countries but instead highlight comparative performance across various metrics. Based on the findings:

Enrollment Rates

For children under age 3: The U.S. ranks below average among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, significantly trailing leaders like Denmark and Norway, which have over 50 percent enrollment for this age group.
For children ages 3–5: The U.S. is not in the top tier but has higher enrollment compared with countries that place less emphasis on early childhood education (e.g., Turkey or Saudi Arabia).

Investment

The U.S. is not in the top group for early childhood education (ECE) spending as a percentage of GDP, with countries like Iceland and Norway consistently leading. The U.S. ranks below average in this metric.

Workforce Qualifications

The U.S. ranks lower compared with countries where most ECE staff have tertiary-level qualifications (e.g., Denmark, Sweden and New Zealand).

Overall

The U.S. generally ranks in the middle to lower tier among OECD and other high-income countries, depending on the specific indicator. If we were to give an approximate sense based on enrollment and investment, the U.S. might be around sixth or seventh out of 10 when compared with countries like Denmark, Norway, France and others known for robust ECE systems. However, this estimate would vary by specific measure.

Other Global Comparisons

Access and Equity

The U.S. does not have universal ECE, and access is often based on socioeconomic status. Publicly funded programs like Head Start aim to serve children from low-income families, but overall access remains limited compared with countries that have universal entitlements. (OECD, 2020)
Cultural and linguistic diversity strategies are employed, but coverage for marginalized groups, including rural and low-income families, is limited. (IEA, 2016)

Funding and Investment

The United States spends less on ECE as a percentage of GDP compared with leading countries like Denmark and Norway, which allocate over 1 percent of GDP to ECE. (OECD, 2020)
ECE settings in the U.S. are a mix of publicly and privately funded, with significant variation in quality and affordability across states. (IEA, 2016)

Staffing and Quality

The U.S. workforce for ECE lacks uniform qualifications compared with OECD counterparts where bachelor's degrees are more common among educators. (IEA, 2016; OECD, 2020)
Ratios and group sizes are regulated, but these vary widely by state, contributing to inconsistent service quality. (OECD, 2020)

U.S. Specific Highlights

State-Level Variations:

There is no centralized national governance for ECE in the U.S., leading to wide disparities in program quality, availability and funding across states. (IEA, 2016)

Program Participation

Enrollment rates rise significantly for children ages 3–5, particularly in prekindergarten programs. However, these remain below the near-universal participation seen in countries like France and the United Kingdom. (OECD, 2020)

Targeted Interventions

Programs like Head Start and Early Head Start target disadvantaged children but have limited reach compared with universal systems. These interventions are often insufficient to address the overall need. (IEA, 2016)

Focus on School Readiness

Unlike many European countries that emphasize broad developmental goals, U.S. ECE programs heavily focus on preparing children for primary education. (OECD, 2020)

Global Lessons

The U.S. could benefit from adopting policies seen in high-ranking countries, such as integrating ECE governance at the national level, increasing public investment to make programs universally accessible, and emphasizing workforce development to ensure high-quality education for all children.